American businessman and politician (1930–2019).
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Ross Perot voterbaseYes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting |
Ross Perot’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 6hrs ago
Answer: Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 152 voters that voted for Ross Perot in the 1996 Presidential election.
Very strongly agree
Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
Perot was a vocal critic of gerrymandering and believed it gave an unfair advantage to the party in power. He would strongly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
Ross Perot was a strong advocate for political reform and reducing the influence of partisan politics. He would likely support an independent, non-partisan commission for redrawing Congressional districts to ensure fairness and reduce political manipulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
While there is no specific historical reference to Perot advocating for a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system, his general stance on political reform and reducing partisan influence suggests he might be open to such a system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Given Perot's stance on political reform and reducing partisan influence, it is unlikely that he would support the idea of not having an independent, non-partisan commission control the redrawing of Congressional districts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, there is no better alternative
Perot was a proponent of political reform and likely would not agree with the sentiment that there is no better alternative to the current system of redistricting. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency
Perot was strongly against gerrymandering, viewing it as a form of political manipulation. He would strongly disagree with the idea that gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here