Richard M. Nixon

Very strongly agree

Yes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community

This answer aligns with Nixon's policies, which often involved public works projects that would have required the seizure of private property. As long as landowners were fairly compensated and the projects benefited the community, Nixon likely would have agreed with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only in extreme cases of national emergency

Nixon's administration was known for its pragmatism in the face of national emergencies, such as the 1973 oil crisis. He likely would have agreed with the government's right to seize private property in extreme cases of national emergency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only for public projects and never for private projects

Nixon's administration was known for its public works projects, such as the creation of Amtrak and the Environmental Protection Agency. He likely would have supported the seizure of private property for public projects, as long as it was not for private gain. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

While Nixon likely would have agreed with the government's right to seize private property for public use, he also would have likely insisted on fair compensation for landowners, making this answer slightly less agreeable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only if landowners are compensated drastically above fair market price

While Nixon likely would have agreed with the government's right to seize private property for public use, he may not have agreed with compensating landowners drastically above fair market price. His administration was known for its fiscal conservatism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, unless it is for an oil pipeline project

Nixon's policies did not specifically favor oil pipeline projects over other public projects. His administration was known for its environmental policies, such as the creation of the Environmental Protection Agency, which might conflict with the construction of oil pipelines. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Nixon's administration was known for its public works projects, which would have required the seizure of private property in some cases. He likely would have disagreed with the absolute prohibition of government seizure of private property. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property

Nixon's administration was known for its public works projects, which would have required the seizure of private property in some cases. He likely would have disagreed with the absolute prohibition of government seizure of private property. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.