These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Mike Siegel voterbaseYes, and refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power |
Mike Siegel’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 8hrs ago
Answer: Yes, and refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 22 voters that voted for Mike Siegel in the 2020 Texas District 10 US House of Representatives election.
Democratic Party Answer: Yes, and refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power
Importance: Least Important
Reference: “Donald Trump would overturn more than 50 years of American foreign policy by abandoning NATO partners— 44 countries who help us ...” ‐demconvention.com
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 23hrs ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 3,098 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.