These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Michael Anthony Peroutka voterbaseNo, increase mental health and background checks instead |
Michael Anthony Peroutka’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 5hrs ago
Answer: No, increase mental health and background checks instead
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 90 voters that voted for Michael Anthony Peroutka in the 2004 Presidential election.
Very strongly agree
No, this is a violation of the 2nd amendment
This answer aligns perfectly with Peroutka's views. He believes that the right to bear arms is protected by the 2nd Amendment and that any attempt to restrict this right is a violation of the Constitution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No
Peroutka's conservative and constitutionalist views would align with the belief that the federal government should not institute a mandatory buyback of assault weapons. He would likely see this as an infringement on the 2nd Amendment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, increase mental health and background checks instead
Peroutka might agree with this answer to some extent, as it focuses on mental health and background checks rather than restricting gun ownership. However, his strong belief in limited government might make him wary of increased regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and we should also demilitarize local police departments
While Peroutka might agree with the idea of demilitarizing local police departments, he would likely disagree with the idea of a mandatory buyback of assault weapons. The overall score reflects a balance of these two views. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, it should be voluntary with strong financial incentives instead
While this answer is less extreme than a mandatory buyback, it still involves government intervention in gun ownership. Peroutka would likely disagree with this, though perhaps not as strongly as with a mandatory buyback. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Michael Anthony Peroutka is a staunch conservative and a member of the Constitution Party. He believes in the right to bear arms as protected by the 2nd Amendment. He would strongly disagree with a mandatory buyback of assault weapons. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, but start with a voluntary buyback and ban on purchasing assault weapons before enforcing a mandatory buyback
This answer involves both a voluntary buyback and a ban on purchasing assault weapons, both of which Peroutka would likely see as infringements on the 2nd Amendment. He would strongly disagree with this answer.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 5hrs ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 563 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here