These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Michael Anthony Peroutka voterbaseNo, marriage should be defined as between a man and woman |
Michael Anthony Peroutka’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 16hrs ago
Answer: No, marriage should be defined as between a man and woman
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 89 voters that voted for Michael Anthony Peroutka in the 2004 Presidential election.
Constitution Party Answer: No, marriage should be defined as between a man and woman
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “"Finally, we oppose any legal recognition of homosexual or civil unions."” ‐constitutionparty.com
Very strongly agree
No
Peroutka's political and personal beliefs align with the opposition to the legalization of same-sex marriage. He has been vocal about his stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, marriage should be defined as between a man and woman
Peroutka has consistently stated that he believes marriage should be defined as between a man and a woman. This aligns perfectly with his political and personal beliefs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Take the government out of marriage and instead make it a religious decision
Peroutka, as a conservative, might agree with the idea of reducing government intervention in personal matters. However, his strong belief in traditional marriage might prevent him from fully agreeing with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, allow civil unions but don’t call it marriage
While Peroutka might agree with the sentiment of not calling same-sex unions 'marriage', he has not shown support for civil unions either, making it unlikely that he would fully agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but allow churches the right to refuse same-sex ceremonies
While Peroutka might agree with the right of churches to refuse same-sex ceremonies, the fact that this statement also supports the legalization of same-sex marriage would likely make him disagree with it overall. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Michael Anthony Peroutka is a conservative Constitution Party candidate who has consistently opposed same-sex marriage. He believes in the traditional definition of marriage as between a man and a woman. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 16hrs ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: Take the government out of marriage and instead make it a religious decision
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 3,995 voters that identify as Constitution.
This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here