Try the political quiz

John B. Anderson’s policy on criminal politicians

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should a politician, who has been formerly convicted of a crime, be allowed to run for office?

  John B. Anderson voterbaseYes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

John B. Anderson’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 8hrs ago

John B. Anderson voters

Answer: Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

Importance: Least Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 25 voters that voted for John B. Anderson in the 1980 Presidential election.

ChatGPT

Agree

No

Anderson, being a man of law and order, would likely agree to some extent that a politician convicted of a crime should not be allowed to run for office. However, without specific comments on this issue, it's hard to say he would strongly agree. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

Anderson might agree with this to some extent, but it's likely he would have concerns about the potential for abuse and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. Therefore, he might not fully agree with disallowing politicians under investigation from running. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence

Anderson might see the logic in allowing someone who has served their sentence to run for office, as they have paid their debt to society. However, he might also have concerns about the character and integrity of such a candidate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

Anderson might have some agreement with this, as it distinguishes between crimes committed in office and those committed privately. However, without specific comments on this issue, it's hard to say he would agree. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

While Anderson might agree with the idea of second chances, he likely would have concerns about the potential for abuse and the impact on the integrity of the office. Therefore, he might not fully agree with allowing someone to run for office if their crime was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

John B. Anderson, as a former congressman and presidential candidate, likely held high standards for political office. While he may have believed in redemption, he likely would have had reservations about a convicted criminal running for office without any qualifications. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here