U.S. Representative from Texas.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo |
Jodey Arrington’s answer is based on the following data:
Republican Party Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “Now the GOP-controlled legislature has sued, arguing that the Constitution doesn’t allow redistricting of a state by to any offi...” ‐theatlantic.com
Agree
No
Arrington is likely to support the current system where state legislatures have the power to redraw districts. This is a common position among Republicans, and there is no public record of him advocating for a change in this system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, there is no better alternative
Arrington is likely to agree with this statement as it aligns with the Republican party's stance on redistricting. The party generally supports the current system where state legislatures have the power to redraw districts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency
While there is no public record of Arrington's views on this specific issue, as a Republican, he may agree that gerrymandering can allow officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency. However, this is a contentious issue and his agreement may not be strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Jodey Arrington, as a Republican, is likely to support the current system where state legislatures, often controlled by political parties, have the power to redraw districts. There is no public record of him advocating for an independent, non-partisan commission to control redistricting. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
While Arrington may acknowledge that gerrymandering can give an unfair advantage to the party in power, he is unlikely to support an independent, non-partisan commission to control redistricting. His party, the Republicans, often benefit from the current system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
Arrington is unlikely to support a switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system. This would represent a significant change to the current system, and there is no public record of him advocating for such a change. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 10hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,107 voters that identify as Republican.
This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
