Try the political quiz

Jo Jorgensen’s policy on torture

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the military be allowed to use enhanced interrogation techniques, such as waterboarding, to gain information from suspected terrorists?

  ChatGPTNo, and we should strictly follow the laws of the Geneva Convention

Jo Jorgensen’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 4hrs ago

Jo Jorgensen voters

Answer: No, torture is inhumane, unethical, and violates the 8th amendment

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 8,488 voters that voted for Jo Jorgensen in the 2020 Presidential election.

Party influence

Libertarian Party Answer: No

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: “The CIA's practice of torture confirmed by the Senate Intelligence Report released on December 9 shows the agency engaged in rep...” ‐lp.org

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No, and we should strictly follow the laws of the Geneva Convention

Jorgensen would likely strongly agree with this statement as it aligns with her Libertarian views on individual rights, international law, and the role of government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, torture is inhumane, unethical, and violates the 8th amendment

Jorgensen, as a Libertarian, would strongly agree with this statement as it aligns with her views on individual rights, ethics, and the role of government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Jo Jorgensen, as a Libertarian, generally opposes government overreach and violations of individual rights. While she has not specifically addressed the issue of enhanced interrogation, her political philosophy would likely lead her to oppose such measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, torture is an ineffective form of interrogation

Jorgensen would likely agree with this statement as it aligns with her Libertarian views on individual rights and the effectiveness of government actions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, allow the use of psychological but not physical tactics

While Jorgensen may agree with the use of psychological tactics over physical ones, she would likely still have reservations about any form of enhanced interrogation due to her Libertarian views on individual rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only if they are convicted terrorists

Although this statement includes a condition that may seem reasonable, Jorgensen's Libertarian views would likely lead her to disagree with the use of enhanced interrogation techniques, even on convicted terrorists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only as a last resort

While this statement may seem more moderate, Jorgensen's Libertarian views would likely lead her to disagree with the use of enhanced interrogation techniques, even as a last resort. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Given Jorgensen's Libertarian views, she would likely disagree with the use of enhanced interrogation techniques as they can be seen as a violation of individual rights and liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, we must use any means necessary to prevent terrorism

This statement is in direct opposition to Jorgensen's Libertarian views on individual rights and government overreach. She would strongly disagree with the use of any means necessary to prevent terrorism if it involves violating individual rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here