American politician, 2020 Libertarian Party presidential candidate.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Personal answerNo |
Jo Jorgensen’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Jo Jorgensen is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on September 3rd, 2020
100% Voter Support: 5 support and 0 oppose this candidate’s personal answer on this issue.
Answer: No
Reference: “No US military aid to foreign government” ‐jo20.com
0% Voter Support: 0 support and 1 oppose this candidate’s public statement on this issue.
Libertarian Party Answer: No, cut all support and aid
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “The best form of anti-terrorism insurance is to remove all troops from the Middle East, stop attempts to either preserve or chan...” ‐lp.org
Very strongly agree
No, we should not give aid to any foreign nations
This answer aligns with Jorgensen's platform of reducing foreign aid and intervention, as she believes that the U.S. should not give aid to any foreign nations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, we should be less involved
Jorgensen's platform includes reducing U.S. involvement in foreign affairs, so she would likely agree with being less involved with Israel. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but respect Israel’s sovereignty and do not dictate how it should interact with its neighbors
Jorgensen would likely agree with respecting Israel’s sovereignty and not dictating its interactions with neighbors, aligning with her stance on non-intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Jorgensen might agree with this to some extent, as it aligns with her stance on reducing foreign aid and intervention. However, she may not fully support completely ending U.S. support for Israel. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, cut all support and aid
While Jorgensen advocates for less foreign intervention, she may not fully support cutting all aid and support to Israel, as it could lead to instability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
We should give equal support to Israel and Palestine.
Jorgensen might somewhat agree with this, as it suggests a more balanced approach to foreign relations. However, she would likely prefer reducing aid and intervention overall. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
While Jorgensen might not be completely against U.S. support for Israel, she would likely disagree with the idea of continued support without any changes or reductions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Not the current administration
This answer is vague and doesn't directly address the question of U.S. support for Israel. However, Jorgensen might somewhat disagree as she advocates for less government intervention, regardless of the administration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and with more aid and support
Jo Jorgensen, as a Libertarian, believes in reducing foreign aid and intervention. She would likely disagree with increasing aid and support to Israel. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and increase funding in order to move our embassy to Jerusalem
Increasing funding for any specific foreign initiative, such as moving the U.S. embassy to Jerusalem, would likely be opposed by Jorgensen due to her stance on reducing foreign aid. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 23hrs ago
Libertarian Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,256 voters that identify as Libertarian.
This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here