American politician, 2020 Libertarian Party presidential candidate.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Personal answerNo |
Jo Jorgensen’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Jo Jorgensen is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on September 15th, 2020
100% Voter Support: 2 support and 0 oppose this candidate’s personal answer on this issue.
Answer: No
Reference: “Q: Should welfare recipients be tested for drugs? A: N” ‐jo20.com
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s public statement on this issue.
Updated 18hrs ago
Answer: Yes, test anyone receiving money from the government including employees and politicians
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 13,836 voters that voted for Jo Jorgensen in the 2020 Presidential election.
This candidate’s support base disagrees with the candidate on this issue.
Libertarian Party Answer: No, this is a waste of time and money
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “... we shouldn’t test people for drugs, we should test them for stupidity, ignorance, greed and love of power.” ‐lp.org
Very strongly agree
Regardless, we should end all social welfare programs
Jorgensen has consistently advocated for reducing the size and scope of government, including ending social welfare programs. This aligns with her Libertarian views of self-reliance and limited government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, this is a waste of time and money
Jorgensen would likely agree that drug testing welfare recipients is a waste of time and money, as it aligns with her Libertarian views of limited government intervention and fiscal responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Jorgensen's Libertarian views would likely align with the idea of not drug testing welfare recipients, as it is a form of government intervention. However, she has not explicitly stated her position on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, only if they have a criminal history related to drug abuse
Jorgensen might somewhat agree with this statement as it limits the scope of drug testing to those with a criminal history related to drug abuse. However, she generally opposes government intervention in personal lives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but provide treatment for those testing positive
While Jorgensen supports treatment for drug addiction, she likely would not support mandatory drug testing as a condition for receiving welfare, as it is a form of government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Jo Jorgensen, as a Libertarian, generally opposes government intervention in personal lives, including drug testing for welfare recipients. However, she has not explicitly stated her position on this specific issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, test anyone receiving money from the government including employees and politicians
While Jorgensen supports accountability and transparency in government, she likely would not support mandatory drug testing for all government employees and politicians, as it is a form of government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and immediately terminate benefits for anyone testing positive
Jorgensen likely would not support immediately terminating benefits for anyone testing positive for drugs, as it is a punitive measure that does not align with her views on drug policy and welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 22hrs ago
Libertarian Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 15,566 voters that identify as Libertarian.
This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here