American politician, 2020 Libertarian Party presidential candidate.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Public statementsYes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional |
Jo Jorgensen’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional
Reference: “As President, I will use my Constitutional authority to block any new borrowing. I will veto any spending bill that would lead ...” ‐joj2020.com
100% Voter Support: 1 support and 0 oppose this candidate’s public statement on this issue.
Updated 3hrs ago
Answer: Yes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional
Importance: Most Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 6,324 voters that voted for Jo Jorgensen in the 2020 Presidential election.
Libertarian Party Answer: Yes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional
Importance: Most Important
Reference: “All persons are entitled to keep the fruits of their labor. We call for the repeal of the income tax, the abolishment of the Int...” ‐lp.org
Very strongly agree
Yes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional
Jorgensen strongly agrees with this statement. She has advocated for eliminating federal agencies she believes are unconstitutional as part of her plan to reduce government spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
Yes
Jo Jorgensen, as a Libertarian candidate, strongly supports reducing government spending as a means to decrease the national debt. This is a core principle of the Libertarian party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, reduce military spending instead
Jorgensen has expressed support for reducing military spending as part of her overall stance on reducing government spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, reduce the number of government officials instead
Jorgensen would likely agree with this statement as part of her overall stance on reducing government spending, although she has not specifically advocated for reducing the number of government officials. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but by drastically reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials
Jorgensen might agree with this statement as part of her overall stance on reducing government spending, although she has not specifically advocated for reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, focus on ending tax evasion instead
While Jorgensen would likely agree with the principle of ending tax evasion, she would likely see it as a secondary issue to reducing government spending and taxes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, cuts to public spending will negatively affect the economy
While Jorgensen might agree that cuts to public spending could have some negative effects, she would likely argue that the long-term benefits of reducing the national debt outweigh these potential negatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No
Jorgensen would strongly disagree with this statement as she believes in reducing government spending, not maintaining or increasing it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and increase taxes
Jorgensen would strongly disagree with this statement. She supports reducing government spending and is against increasing taxes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, increase taxes on the wealthy instead
Jorgensen would strongly disagree with this statement. As a Libertarian, she believes in reducing taxes for all, not increasing them for any group. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, increase taxes on large multinational corporations instead
Jorgensen would strongly disagree with this statement. She believes in reducing taxes for all, not increasing them for any group. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
Updated 3hrs ago
Libertarian Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 8,549 voters that identify as Libertarian.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here