American politician, 2020 Libertarian Party presidential candidate.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, not until we decrease our national debt |
Jo Jorgensen’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 23hrs ago
Answer: No, not until we decrease our national debt
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 3,874 voters that voted for Jo Jorgensen in the 2020 Presidential election.
Libertarian Party Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “"Retirement planning is the responsibility of the individual, not the government. Libertarians would phase out the current gover...” ‐lp.org
Strongly agree
No, not until we decrease our national debt
Jorgensen has expressed concern about the national debt and the need for fiscal responsibility. She would likely agree with the idea of not increasing pension payments until the national debt is decreased. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, they should be reduced
As a Libertarian, Jorgensen would likely support measures to reduce government spending, which could include reducing pension payments. However, she may not fully agree if this implies reducing benefits without any reform or consideration for the individuals affected. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Jorgensen's Libertarian views would likely lead her to agree with not increasing pension payments, as this would increase government spending. However, she may not fully agree if this implies maintaining the current system without any reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, but only for low-income pensioners
While Jorgensen might support measures to help low-income individuals, she generally opposes government intervention and prefers market-based solutions. Therefore, she might neither strongly agree nor disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, for government workers but not for politicians
Jorgensen might agree with the sentiment of holding politicians accountable, but as a Libertarian, she generally opposes government intervention and prefers market-based solutions. Therefore, she might slightly disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, adjust them yearly for cost of living
While adjusting pensions for cost of living might seem fair, Jorgensen's Libertarian views would likely lead her to oppose such a measure as it would increase government spending and intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Jo Jorgensen, as a Libertarian candidate, generally supports reducing government spending and promoting fiscal responsibility. She would likely not support a blanket increase in pension payments for all retired government workers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 23hrs ago
Libertarian Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 668 voters that identify as Libertarian.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here