Jill Stein

Very strongly agree

Yes

Jill Stein has been a vocal opponent of the Dakota Access pipeline. She was even charged with criminal trespassing and mischief for her participation in a protest against the pipeline in 2016. She believes that the pipeline poses a threat to the environment and to the rights of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Yes, and the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain

Stein has been a strong advocate for the rights of indigenous people and has spoken out against the use of eminent domain for corporate gain. She would likely strongly agree with the idea that the government should never be allowed to acquire land by eminent domain. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but reroute the pipeline away from Native American land

While Stein would likely support any measures to protect Native American land, she has been clear in her opposition to the pipeline in its entirety, not just its proposed route. Therefore, she would only somewhat agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, but drastically increase the amount of fines the company must pay in the event of an accident

Stein would likely agree that companies should be held accountable for accidents, but her primary concern is preventing the pipeline from being built at all. Therefore, she would only slightly agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No

Stein has consistently opposed the Dakota Access pipeline, citing environmental concerns and the rights of indigenous people. She would strongly disagree with the idea of allowing the pipeline's construction to continue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.