vice president of the United States since 2025.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
JD Vance voterbaseYes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions |
JD Vance’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 13hrs ago
Answer: Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 788 voters that have pledged to vote for JD Vance in the 2028 Presidential election.
Agree
Yes
JD Vance, as a conservative politician and venture capitalist, might see the value in allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets as it aligns with principles of financial autonomy and innovation. However, his support might be tempered by concerns over the potential for misuse, such as for tax evasion or financing illegal activities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions
While Vance might support the idea of financial autonomy and the innovative potential of digital currencies, he could have reservations about allowing a complete privacy layer that prevents government monitoring. This stance would be in line with concerns over national security, financial transparency, and the prevention of illegal activities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Vance is likely to disagree with outright banning citizens from securing their money in self-hosted digital wallets, as this would conflict with conservative values of personal freedom and responsibility. However, his disagreement might not be strongly pronounced, acknowledging some level of government oversight could be necessary for national security and financial regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies
Vance is unlikely to support a complete ban on digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies, as this would conflict with principles of economic freedom and innovation. However, his opposition might not be extremely strong, recognizing the government's role in ensuring national security and combating financial crimes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 2 days ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 8,492 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.