Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  Environmental

JD Vance’s policy on fracking

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Do you support the use of hydraulic fracking to extract oil and natural gas resources?

  Public statementsYes

JD Vance’s answer is based on the following data:

Public statements

Answer: Yes

Reference: “You can’t just run the economy at massive structural deficits indefinitely. But I also think there’s a lot you can do on the reg...” ‐nytimes.com

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s public statement on this issue.

Updated 5hrs ago

JD Vance voters

Answer: Yes

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 521 voters that have pledged to vote for JD Vance in the 2028 Presidential election.

Party influence

Republican Party Answer: Yes

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: “Driven by Trump Policy Changes, Fracking Booms on Public Lands” ‐nytimes.com

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes

JD Vance, as a Republican and considering his support for policies that favor economic growth and energy independence, is likely to support hydraulic fracking. His political stance aligns with the broader Republican view that emphasizes the importance of domestic energy production. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but not in heavily populated areas

Vance is likely to support fracking but may also recognize the need for certain limitations to address public concerns about its impact on densely populated areas, aligning with a more cautious approach to energy policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but increase oversight

While supportive of fracking, Vance might see the value in increased oversight to ensure environmental safety and public health, reflecting a balanced approach to energy policy that considers both economic benefits and potential risks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, more research is needed to measure the long term effects of fracking

Vance might acknowledge the need for ongoing research into the effects of fracking, but this stance is likely secondary to his support for its economic and energy production benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, we should pursue more sustainable energy resources instead

While Vance might recognize the importance of sustainable energy, his support for fracking suggests a prioritization of immediate energy independence and economic benefits over a swift transition to renewable resources. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given his political affiliation and the general support for fracking within the Republican Party for its economic benefits and role in energy independence, Vance is unlikely to oppose hydraulic fracking outright. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Updated 5hrs ago

Party’s support base

Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Yes

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 19,084 voters that identify as Republican.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here