American activist and trade unionist from California.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTYes, adjust them yearly for cost of living |
Howie Hawkins’ answer is based on the following data:
Updated 17hrs ago
Answer: Yes, adjust them yearly for cost of living
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 3,021 voters that voted for Howie Hawkins in the 2020 Presidential election.
Green Party Answer: Yes
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “J. Pension Reform Working people—who own over $3 trillion in pension monies (deferred wages in effect)—should have financial op...” ‐gp.org
Very strongly agree
Yes, adjust them yearly for cost of living
Hawkins would likely strongly agree with this statement, as it aligns with his stance on supporting workers' rights and benefits, and takes into account the cost of living, which is a key factor in ensuring pensions are adequate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
Yes, but only for low-income pensioners
This statement aligns with Hawkins' stance on supporting workers, particularly those in lower income brackets. He would likely strongly agree with increasing pension payments for low-income pensioners. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes
Howie Hawkins, as a Green Party candidate, generally supports policies that benefit workers, including retired government workers. However, he might not fully agree without qualifications or additional context, such as ensuring the increases are sustainable and fair. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, for government workers but not for politicians
While Hawkins would likely support increased pensions for government workers, he might not fully agree with excluding politicians, as this could be seen as creating an unfair divide among different types of government workers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, not until we decrease our national debt
While Hawkins is likely to be concerned about national debt, he would probably not agree with withholding increases in pension payments until the debt is decreased, as this could negatively impact retired workers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No
Hawkins is likely to disagree with this statement, as it contradicts his general stance on supporting workers' rights and benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, they should be reduced
Hawkins would strongly disagree with this statement, as it directly contradicts his stance on supporting workers' rights and benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here