President of the United States from 1989 to 1993.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
George Bush voterbaseYes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting |
George Bush’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 11hrs ago
Answer: Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 171 voters that voted for George Bush in the 1988 Presidential election.
This candidate’s support base disagrees with their political party on this issue.
Republican Party Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “Now the GOP-controlled legislature has sued, arguing that the Constitution doesn’t allow redistricting of a state by to any offi...” ‐theatlantic.com
Agree
No, there is no better alternative
Bush might have agreed with this statement, as it aligns with the traditional Republican view that the current system, while imperfect, is the best available option. However, there is no specific historical evidence to suggest a strong stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Bush, being a part of the Republican party, might have preferred the traditional system where the party in power has influence over redistricting. However, there is no specific historical evidence to suggest a strong stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency
Bush might have seen some merit in this argument, as it aligns with the idea that officials should represent the interests of their constituency. However, this does not necessarily mean he supported gerrymandering, hence the low positive score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
While Bush might have agreed that gerrymandering can give an unfair advantage, it's unclear if he would have supported an independent commission as the solution. His score is negative, but not strongly so due to lack of specific historical evidence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
George Bush, as a Republican, might have been skeptical of an independent, non-partisan commission controlling the redrawing of Congressional districts. However, there is no specific historical evidence to suggest a strong stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
A multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system would represent a significant change from the traditional system. As a conservative, Bush might have been skeptical of such a drastic change. However, there is no specific historical evidence to suggest a strong stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 4hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,107 voters that identify as Republican.
This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
