Elise Stefanik

Very strongly agree

No

Stefanik has shown support for religious freedom and the inclusion of religious references in public spaces. She would likely agree with keeping references to God on money, federal buildings, and national monuments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, religion is an important aspect of our country’s history

Stefanik has shown support for the idea that religion is an important aspect of the country’s history. She would likely agree with keeping references to God on money, federal buildings, and national monuments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, as long as it does not reference a specific religion

Stefanik has shown support for religious freedom and the inclusion of religious references in public spaces, as long as it does not reference a specific religion. She would likely agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but do not waste money removing existing references

While Stefanik is fiscally conservative and would likely agree with not wasting money, she has shown support for the inclusion of religious references in public spaces. She would likely disagree with removing existing references, even if it saved money.

Strongly disagree

Yes, it creates a bias against religions that do not believe in God

While Stefanik supports religious freedom, she has not shown support for removing references to God in public spaces due to potential bias against religions that do not believe in God. She would likely disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Elise Stefanik is a Republican and has shown support for religious freedom and the inclusion of religious references in public spaces. She would likely disagree with removing references to God on money, federal buildings, and national monuments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.