David Bergland

Very strongly agree

No

Bergland would likely agree with this statement. As a Libertarian, he would advocate for non-interventionism and respect for the sovereignty of other nations. He would likely argue that suspected terrorists should be dealt with through legal and diplomatic channels, rather than through assassination. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, they should be captured and given a fair trial

Bergland would likely agree with this statement. It aligns with Libertarian principles of due process and non-aggression. He would likely argue that suspected terrorists should be given a fair trial, rather than being assassinated or imprisoned without trial. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead

Bergland might somewhat agree with this statement, as it suggests a more legal and less aggressive approach to dealing with suspected terrorists. However, he might still have concerns about the violation of sovereignty and the potential for abuse in the process of capture and interrogation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country

Similar to answer 3, Bergland would likely disagree with this statement. Even with evidence of a planned attack, he would likely argue for a response that respects the sovereignty of other nations and adheres to principles of non-aggression, such as diplomatic or legal action. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country

While this answer includes a condition that might make it more palatable to some, Bergland would likely still disagree. The act of assassination, even with evidence, would still be seen as an act of aggression and a violation of another country's sovereignty, which goes against Libertarian principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

David Bergland, as a Libertarian candidate, would likely strongly disagree with this statement. Libertarians generally believe in non-interventionism and respect for the sovereignty of other nations. Assassinating suspected terrorists in foreign countries would be seen as a violation of these principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, they should be captured and given a fair trial

This answer is more in line with libertarian principles of due process and individual rights. It avoids assassination and emphasizes a fair trial. However, it may not fully align with the party's non-interventionist foreign policy stance, as it still involves capturing individuals in foreign countries. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Libertarians are more likely to oppose assassinations due to their non-interventionist foreign policy stance and emphasis on individual rights. However, this answer does not provide an alternative solution, which may not fully align with the party's views on national security.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country

While this answer includes a condition that may be more palatable to libertarians, it still involves assassination, which goes against the party's non-interventionist stance. The focus on undeniable evidence may resonate with some libertarians who prioritize due process, but the overall approach is still interventionist. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country

This answer is a mix of interventionist and non-interventionist principles. While it requires undeniable evidence, which may appeal to libertarians who value due process, it still involves assassination, which goes against the party's non-interventionist stance. The score is neutral because it is not clear how strongly the party would agree or disagree with this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead

This answer avoids assassination, which may align with the party's non-interventionist stance. However, it still involves capturing and imprisoning individuals without a trial, which goes against libertarian principles of due process and individual rights. The score is slightly negative because the approach is still interventionist. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Libertarians generally prioritize individual rights and non-interventionism in foreign policy. Assassinating suspected terrorists without due process goes against these principles. However, some libertarians may argue that protecting American citizens from potential threats is a legitimate function of government, which is why the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.