American politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Personal answerNo |
Darrell Castle’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Darrell Castle is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on June 12th, 2016
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s personal answer on this issue.
Updated 20hrs ago
Answer: No, remove them from the U.S.
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 31 voters that voted for Darrell Castle in the 2024 Presidential election.
Very strongly agree
No
Castle would agree with this statement as he does not support amnesty for illegal immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, remove them from the U.S.
Castle's platform includes strict enforcement of immigration laws, which would include removing illegal immigrants from the U.S. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, fine companies that employ illegal immigrants
Castle would likely support fining companies that employ illegal immigrants as part of his belief in enforcing immigration laws. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Darrell Castle, as a Constitution Party candidate, strongly believes in upholding the law and the Constitution. He would not support amnesty for illegal immigrants as it would be a violation of the law. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, but allow them to stay
Castle's stance on immigration is clear: he believes in the enforcement of immigration laws and would not support allowing illegal immigrants to stay in the U.S. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, but only if they pay taxes
Even if illegal immigrants pay taxes, Castle would not support granting them amnesty. His stance is based on upholding the law and the Constitution. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, create a simple path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record
Castle does not support creating a simple path to citizenship for illegal immigrants. He believes in upholding the law and the Constitution, and would view this as a violation of both. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Constitution Party Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: “We support and demand legislation–a legal immigration system that complements and promotes the best for the United States of Ame...” ‐constitutionparty.com
Very strongly agree
No, fine companies that employ illegal immigrants
The Constitution Party supports enforcing immigration laws and holding companies accountable for employing illegal immigrants. They believe in strict adherence to the Constitution and the rule of law, which includes penalizing those who break immigration laws. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, remove them from the U.S.
The Constitution Party supports enforcing immigration laws and removing illegal immigrants from the U.S. They believe in strict adherence to the Constitution and the rule of law, which includes enforcing existing immigration laws. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The Constitution Party generally opposes amnesty for illegal immigrants and supports enforcing existing immigration laws. This answer aligns with their stance on upholding the Constitution and the rule of law. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, but only if they pay taxes
While the Constitution Party is generally against amnesty for illegal immigrants, some members may be open to limited amnesty if the immigrants pay taxes. However, this is not a widely held view within the party and may not be a priority for the party as a whole. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, create a simple path to citizenship for immigrants with no criminal record
While the Constitution Party is generally against amnesty for illegal immigrants, some members may be open to a path to citizenship for those with no criminal record. However, this is not a widely held view within the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The Constitution Party generally opposes amnesty for illegal immigrants, as they believe in strict adherence to the Constitution and the rule of law. However, some members may be open to limited amnesty under specific conditions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, but allow them to stay
The Constitution Party is generally against allowing illegal immigrants to stay in the U.S. without facing consequences for breaking immigration laws. They believe in upholding the Constitution and the rule of law. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 20hrs ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 523 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here