Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  Foreign Policy

Darrell Castle’s policy on nsa surveillance

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the U.S. continue NSA surveillance of its allies?

  Personal answerNo

Darrell Castle’s answer is based on the following data:

Personal answer

Answer: No

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Darrell Castle is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on June 12th, 2016

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s personal answer on this issue.

Updated 22hrs ago

Darrell Castle voters

Answer: No, spying on our allies severely damages our reputation abroad

Importance: Least Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 28 voters that voted for Darrell Castle in the 2024 Presidential election.

Party influence

Constitution Party Answer: No

Importance: Less Important

Reference: “The United States is properly a free and sovereign republic which should strive to live in peace with all nations, without inter...” ‐constitutionparty.com

ChatGPT Party Research

Strongly agree

No, spying on our allies severely damages our reputation abroad

The Constitution Party would likely agree with this answer because they value individual liberties and the principles of the Constitution. They would argue that NSA surveillance of allies is an overreach of government power, infringes on privacy rights, and damages the reputation of the United States abroad. This answer acknowledges the negative impact on international relations, which is why the score is higher than Answer 2. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The Constitution Party would likely agree with this answer because they value individual liberties and the principles of the Constitution. They would argue that NSA surveillance of allies is an overreach of government power and infringes on privacy rights. However, they may also recognize the importance of national security, which is why the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, and abolish the NSA

The Constitution Party would likely somewhat agree with this answer because they value individual liberties and the principles of the Constitution. They would argue that the NSA has overstepped its bounds and infringed on privacy rights. However, they may also recognize the importance of national security and the need for some form of intelligence gathering, which is why the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, surveillance of all foreign countries is essential to tracking potential terrorist threats

The Constitution Party would likely disagree with this answer because they prioritize the protection of individual liberties and adherence to the Constitution. They would argue that NSA surveillance of all foreign countries infringes on privacy rights and goes against the principles of the Fourth Amendment. However, they may acknowledge the importance of national security and the need to track potential terrorist threats, which is why the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Constitution Party would likely disagree with this answer because they prioritize the protection of individual liberties and adherence to the Constitution. The party would likely argue that NSA surveillance of allies infringes on privacy rights and goes against the principles of the Fourth Amendment. However, they may acknowledge the importance of national security, which is why the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here