American politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Personal answerNo, only with a warrant showing probable cause of criminal activity |
Darrell Castle’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: No, only with a warrant showing probable cause of criminal activity
Importance: Most Important
Reference: Darrell Castle is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on June 12th, 2016
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s personal answer on this issue.
Updated 6hrs ago
Answer: No, only with a warrant showing probable cause of criminal activity
Importance: Most Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 103 voters that voted for Darrell Castle in the 2016 Presidential election.
Constitution Party Answer: No
Importance: Most Important
Reference: “We deplore and vigorously oppose legislation and executive action that deprive the people of their rights secured under the Four...” ‐constitutionparty.com
Very strongly agree
No
Castle has been a vocal critic of the NSA's surveillance programs, arguing that they infringe on citizens' privacy rights. He would likely strongly agree with the statement that the NSA should not be allowed to collect basic metadata of citizens' phone calls. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, only with a warrant showing probable cause of criminal activity
While Castle is against the NSA's mass surveillance programs, he might agree with the idea of collecting metadata with a warrant showing probable cause of criminal activity, as this would be more in line with the Fourth Amendment's protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and abolish the NSA
While Castle has been a vocal critic of the NSA's surveillance programs, it's unclear whether he would go as far as to call for the abolition of the NSA entirely. However, given his strong stance on privacy rights, he might be somewhat in favor of this idea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Darrell Castle, as a Constitution Party candidate, strongly believes in the protection of individual privacy rights and the Fourth Amendment. He has consistently opposed the NSA's mass surveillance programs, including the collection of metadata from citizens' phone calls without a warrant. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, basic data collection is necessary to track suspected terrorists
Castle has been clear in his opposition to the NSA's surveillance programs, arguing that they infringe on citizens' privacy rights. He would likely strongly disagree with the statement that basic data collection is necessary to track suspected terrorists, as he believes there are other, less intrusive ways to ensure national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 6hrs ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 237 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here