Try the political quiz

Darrell Castle’s policy on gun liability

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should victims of gun violence be allowed to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers?

  Personal answerYes, no corporation should be immune from the possibility that their product after being introduced into public commerce was defective, etc. and caused harm

Darrell Castle’s answer is based on the following data:

Personal answer

Answer: Yes, no corporation should be immune from the possibility that their product after being introduced into public commerce was defective, etc. and caused harm

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Darrell Castle is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on June 12th, 2016

100% Voter Support: 1 support and 0 oppose this candidate’s personal answer on this issue.

Updated 8hrs ago

Darrell Castle voters

Answer: No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

Importance: More Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 162 voters that voted for Darrell Castle in the 2016 Presidential election.

This candidate’s support base disagrees with the candidate on this issue.

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

No

Castle's stance on the Second Amendment and gun rights would likely lead him to agree with this statement. He has consistently argued against measures that he sees as infringing on the rights of gun owners, including the idea of holding firearms dealers and manufacturers liable for gun violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence

While Castle is a strong supporter of gun rights, he may agree to some extent with the idea of holding manufacturers and dealers liable for negligence. However, his overall stance would likely be against broad liability for gun violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason

While Castle supports the constitutional right to sue, he would likely disagree with this statement as it pertains to gun violence. His support for the Second Amendment and gun rights would likely lead him to oppose measures that could potentially harm firearms dealers and manufacturers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, but only dealers

Castle's strong support for the Second Amendment and gun rights would likely lead him to disagree with this statement. He would likely see this as an unfair burden on firearms dealers, who are not responsible for the actions of those who misuse their products. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

Darrell Castle, as a Constitution Party candidate, strongly supports the Second Amendment and the rights of gun owners. He would likely disagree with the idea of victims of gun violence being able to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers, as this could be seen as an infringement on those rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity

Castle would likely disagree with this statement, as it implies that the primary use of firearms is for illegal activity. As a strong supporter of the Second Amendment, Castle believes in the lawful use of firearms for self-defense and other legal purposes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Updated 1 day ago

Party’s support base

Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No

Importance: Most Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 7,987 voters that identify as Constitution.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here