American politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Personal answerYes, as permitted by the Constitution when the seizure is necessary for public use and when fair market value is paid to the property owner |
Darrell Castle’s answer is based on the following data:
Answer: Yes, as permitted by the Constitution when the seizure is necessary for public use and when fair market value is paid to the property owner
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Darrell Castle is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on June 12th, 2016
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s personal answer on this issue.
Updated 12hrs ago
Answer: No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property
Importance: Most Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 113 voters that voted for Darrell Castle in the 2016 Presidential election.
This candidate’s support base disagrees with the candidate on this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 12hrs ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 424 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
