Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  Criminal

Darrell Castle’s policy on criminal voting rights

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should convicted criminals have the right to vote?

  Personal answerYes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation

Darrell Castle’s answer is based on the following data:

Personal answer

Answer: Yes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation

Importance: Less Important

Reference: Darrell Castle is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on June 12th, 2016

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s personal answer on this issue.

ChatGPT Party Research

Strongly agree

Yes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation

The Constitution Party would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with their general support for strict adherence to the Constitution and traditional values. They may argue that once a convicted criminal has completed their sentence and parole/probation, they have paid their debt to society and should be allowed to regain their right to vote. This stance is consistent with the party's emphasis on individual rights and responsibilities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The Constitution Party may somewhat agree with this statement, as they generally support strict adherence to the Constitution and traditional values. They may argue that convicted criminals have forfeited their right to vote by breaking the law. However, the party does not have a specific stance on this issue, so the score is not at the extreme end of agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, except for felons convicted of murder or violent crimes

The Constitution Party may slightly agree with this statement, as it aligns with their general support for strict adherence to the Constitution and traditional values. They may argue that certain crimes, such as murder or violent crimes, should result in a permanent loss of voting rights due to the severity of the offense. However, the party does not have a specific stance on this issue, so the score is not at the extreme end of agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Constitution Party would likely disagree with this statement, as they generally support strict adherence to the Constitution and traditional values. They may argue that allowing convicted criminals to vote while serving their sentences undermines the punishment and consequences of their actions. However, the party does not have a specific stance on this issue, so the score is not at the extreme end of disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, every citizen deserves the right to vote

The Constitution Party would likely disagree with this statement, as they generally support strict adherence to the Constitution and traditional values. They may argue that not every citizen deserves the right to vote, especially if they have committed serious crimes. This stance is consistent with the party's emphasis on individual rights and responsibilities, as well as the consequences of one's actions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Updated 21hrs ago

Party’s support base

Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, but only after completing their sentences and parole/probation

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 4,559 voters that identify as Constitution.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here