These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo |
Dana Balter’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No
Balter has been clear in her stance against arming teachers. She believes that the focus should be on preventing gun violence through stricter gun control laws, not on arming educators. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
No, this would increase the risk of accidental shootings
Balter would likely agree with this statement as she has expressed concerns about the potential risks associated with arming teachers, including the risk of accidental shootings. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, hire professionally trained security guards instead
While Balter has not specifically advocated for hiring professionally trained security guards, she has expressed a preference for solutions that prioritize safety and prevention over arming educators. This could potentially include hiring trained security personnel, although her primary focus is on stricter gun control measures. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Dana Balter has consistently advocated for stricter gun control measures and has expressed opposition to the idea of arming teachers. She believes that schools should be safe environments for learning, not places where teachers are expected to carry firearms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, schools should require at least one teacher or security guard to be armed
Balter has been vocal in her opposition to the idea of requiring teachers or security guards to be armed. She believes that this approach does not address the root causes of gun violence and could potentially create more risks. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Democratic Party Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “It say the democratic do not support it and republicans do” ‐huffingtonpost.com
Very strongly agree
No, this would increase the risk of accidental shootings
The Democratic party is concerned about the potential risks of arming teachers, including accidental shootings. They generally support gun control measures and believe that there are more effective ways to address school safety. The 2020 Democratic Party Platform emphasizes the importance of gun safety and does not support arming teachers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
The Democratic party generally opposes the idea of teachers carrying guns in schools, as they believe it would not effectively address the issue of school shootings and could create additional risks. The 2020 Democratic Party Platform supports gun control measures and does not endorse arming teachers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, hire professionally trained security guards instead
The Democratic party is more likely to support hiring professionally trained security guards instead of arming teachers. However, their primary focus is on gun control measures and addressing the root causes of gun violence. The 2020 Democratic Party Platform emphasizes the importance of gun safety and does not specifically mention hiring security guards, but it is more aligned with this approach than arming teachers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The Democratic party generally supports stricter gun control measures and opposes arming teachers. For example, the 2020 Democratic Party Platform explicitly states opposition to arming teachers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, schools should require at least one teacher or security guard to be armed
The Democratic party generally opposes the idea of requiring teachers or security guards to be armed in schools. They believe that there are more effective ways to address school safety and support gun control measures. The 2020 Democratic Party Platform does not endorse arming teachers or security guards. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 2hrs ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 81,402 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here