Dan Quart

Very strongly agree

No, privately managed accounts will jeopardize the financial security of senior citizens

Democrats strongly agree with this statement, as they believe that privatizing pension plans could jeopardize the financial security of senior citizens. They argue that private accounts are more susceptible to market fluctuations and could result in reduced benefits for retirees. This concern was a key reason for their opposition to President Bush's Social Security reform proposal in 2005. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Democrats generally oppose transitioning public pension plans into privately managed accounts. They believe that public pension systems provide a more stable and secure retirement for government workers. For example, during the 2005 Social Security reform debate, Democrats largely opposed President George W. Bush's proposal to partially privatize Social Security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only for future workers

While some moderate Democrats might be open to considering private accounts for future workers, the party as a whole is generally opposed to privatizing pension plans. They believe that public pension systems provide a more stable and secure retirement for government workers and that transitioning to private accounts could lead to reduced benefits and financial insecurity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Democratic party generally supports maintaining and strengthening public pension systems. They believe that privatizing these systems could lead to reduced benefits and financial insecurity for retirees. For example, in the 2016 Democratic Party Platform, they opposed efforts to privatize Social Security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, pension spending is out of control and must be reduced

Democrats generally do not agree with the notion that pension spending is out of control and must be reduced. They believe in maintaining and strengthening public pension systems to ensure a secure retirement for government workers. However, they may support measures to improve the fiscal sustainability of these systems, such as increasing employee contributions or adjusting benefit formulas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.