Try the political quiz

Dan Feehan’s policy on gerrymandering

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the redrawing of Congressional districts be controlled by an independent, non-partisan commission?

  ChatGPTYes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

Dan Feehan’s answer is based on the following data:

Party influence

Democratic Party Answer: Yes

Importance: Least Important

Reference: “"Gerrymandering distorts our democracy. Democrats will enact measures to end partisan gerrymandering in federal elections. Effor...” ‐democrats.org

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting

Feehan, as a Democrat, is likely to strongly agree with the statement that gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting. This is a common viewpoint among Democrats, who often argue for reforms to prevent gerrymandering. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

Dan Feehan, as a Democratic candidate, is likely to support the idea of an independent, non-partisan commission controlling the redrawing of Congressional districts. This is a common stance among Democrats who argue that it can help prevent gerrymandering and ensure fair representation. However, without specific statements from Feehan on this issue, the score is not a full 5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system

While Feehan may be open to various reforms to the redistricting process, it's unclear whether he would specifically support a switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system. This is a more specific and less commonly discussed reform than simply advocating for an independent, non-partisan commission to control redistricting. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given that Feehan is likely to support independent redistricting, he would likely disagree with the idea that it should not be controlled by an independent, non-partisan commission. However, without specific statements from Feehan on this issue, the score is not a full -5. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, there is no better alternative

Feehan, as a Democrat, is likely to disagree with the statement that there is no better alternative to the current system of redistricting. Democrats often argue for reforms to the redistricting process to prevent gerrymandering and ensure fair representation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency

Feehan, as a Democrat, is likely to strongly disagree with the statement that gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency. This viewpoint is often associated with those who support gerrymandering as a political strategy, which is typically not a stance taken by Democrats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Updated 1 day ago

Party’s support base

Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes

Importance: More Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,834 voters that identify as Democratic.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here