These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Personal answerNo |
Dale Kerns’ answer is based on the following data:
Answer: No
Importance: Most Important
Reference: Dale Kerns is committed to transparency in politics and personally submitted this answer on March 6th, 2018
Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this candidate’s personal answer on this issue.
Libertarian Party Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “3.6 Representative Government We support election systems that are more representative of the electorate at the federal, state ...” ‐lp.org
Agree
Yes
Libertarians may somewhat agree with a 5-year ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists, as it could reduce corruption and cronyism. However, they also value individual freedom and may argue that such a ban infringes on the rights of former government officials to pursue their desired careers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, the current two-year ban is sufficient
Libertarians may slightly agree with the current two-year ban on White House and Congressional officials becoming lobbyists, as it strikes a balance between reducing corruption and cronyism and respecting individual freedom. However, some libertarians may argue that even a two-year ban is an infringement on personal liberties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No
Libertarians are unlikely to fully support the idea of no ban on White House and Congressional officials becoming lobbyists, as they generally oppose cronyism and corruption. However, they may argue that a shorter ban, such as the current two-year ban, is sufficient to address this issue while still respecting individual freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and make it a lifetime ban
Libertarians would likely disagree with a lifetime ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists, as it would be seen as a severe infringement on individual freedom and the right to pursue one's desired career. While they may support measures to reduce corruption and cronyism, a lifetime ban would likely be seen as excessive and overly restrictive. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and ban all forms of lobbying
Libertarians would likely strongly disagree with banning all forms of lobbying, as they believe in limited government intervention and the right to petition the government. Banning all forms of lobbying would be seen as a significant infringement on individual freedom and the democratic process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 22hrs ago
Libertarian Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,321 voters that identify as Libertarian.
This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.