Try the political quiz

Candidates  ›  Policies  ›  Foreign Policy

Clark Patterson’s policy on drones

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the military fly drones over foreign countries to gain intelligence and kill suspected terrorists?

  ChatGPT Party ResearchNo, the military has no right to do so without a Congressional declaration of war

Clark Patterson’s answer is based on the following data:

Party influence

Libertarian Party Answer: No

Importance: Somewhat Important

Reference: “The Libertarian Party calls for an immediate end to drone strikes in Yemen.” ‐lp.org

ChatGPT Party Research

Strongly agree

No, the military has no right to do so without a Congressional declaration of war

Libertarians often emphasize the importance of following the Constitution, which grants Congress the power to declare war. They would likely argue that military actions, such as drone strikes, should only be conducted with proper Congressional authorization to ensure checks and balances and prevent executive overreach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Many Libertarians would agree with this answer due to their non-interventionist foreign policy stance. They believe that the U.S. should not interfere in the affairs of other countries and that military actions should be limited to direct threats to national security. However, some may argue that gathering intelligence is necessary for self-defense. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only with permission from the country in question

This answer aligns with the Libertarian principle of respecting the sovereignty of other nations. By seeking permission from the country in question, the U.S. would be acknowledging their right to self-determination and avoiding unilateral military actions. However, some Libertarians may still argue that any intervention, even with permission, is unnecessary and potentially harmful. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, only to gather intelligence, not to kill suspected terrorists

Some Libertarians may agree with this answer as a compromise between non-interventionism and the need for intelligence gathering. They may argue that gathering intelligence is necessary for self-defense, but that killing suspected terrorists without due process or proper authorization is a violation of individual rights and international law. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Libertarians generally prioritize individual rights and non-interventionism. While some may see the use of drones as a necessary tool in combating terrorism, many would argue that it infringes on the sovereignty of foreign nations and can lead to unintended civilian casualties. However, the party does not have a unified stance on this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, the U.S. needs to use all means necessary to combat terrorism

This answer is more aligned with a neoconservative or interventionist foreign policy, which is generally not supported by Libertarians. Libertarians tend to prioritize individual rights and non-interventionism, and they would likely argue that using 'all means necessary' could lead to violations of civil liberties and unnecessary military actions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Candidate’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here