U.S. Representative from Iowa.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTYes, but do not waste money removing existing references |
Cindy Axne’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 7hrs ago
Answer: Yes, but do not waste money removing existing references
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 29 voters that voted for Cindy Axne in the 2022 Iowa District 3 US House of Representatives election.
Democratic Party Answer: Yes
Importance: Least Important
Reference: “Democrats believe in the Constitution — which protects the right of all Americans to worship how they choose, and also protects ...” ‐democrats.org
Agree
Yes, but do not waste money removing existing references
Axne, as a fiscal conservative, might agree with the sentiment of not wasting money on removing existing references, while still supporting the principle of separation of church and state. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, it creates a bias against religions that do not believe in God
Axne, as a Democrat, likely supports policies that promote inclusivity and non-discrimination, which could include removing references that may create a bias against certain religions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes
Cindy Axne, a Democrat, likely supports the separation of church and state, but there is no clear evidence that she would advocate for the removal of references to God on money, federal buildings, and national monuments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, as long as it does not reference a specific religion
There is no clear evidence to suggest that Axne would agree or disagree with this statement. Her stance on this specific issue is not well-documented. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No
While Axne likely supports the separation of church and state, she has not explicitly advocated for maintaining references to God on money, federal buildings, and national monuments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, religion is an important aspect of our country’s history
While Axne likely acknowledges the historical significance of religion in the U.S., there is no clear evidence to suggest that she would oppose the removal of religious references on the grounds of preserving history. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 2 days ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 4,624 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here