American politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Chuck Baldwin voterbaseNo, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled |
Chuck Baldwin’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 9hrs ago
Answer: No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 106 voters that voted for Chuck Baldwin in the 2008 Presidential election.
Constitution Party Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: “General Welfare is not the same as individual Welfare. General Welfare would benefit the people generally, individual Welfare ta...” ‐constitutionparty.com
Very strongly agree
No, and each state should decide their own level of coverage
Baldwin would strongly agree with this statement. His party's principles support states' rights and limited federal intervention, so he would likely agree with each state deciding their own level of coverage. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
Baldwin's stance on limited government and fiscal conservatism would likely lead him to agree with not increasing federal funding for Medicaid. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, and the federal government should not increase funding for any social programs
Baldwin would likely agree with this statement. His party's principles of limited government and fiscal conservatism would lead him to oppose increasing federal funding for social programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and abolish Medicaid
Baldwin might somewhat agree with this statement. His party's principles of limited government and fiscal conservatism would lead him to support reducing government programs, although it's unclear if he would go as far as to abolish Medicaid. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and eligibility should only include the elderly and disabled
Baldwin might somewhat agree with this statement. While he generally supports limited government intervention, he might agree with providing support for the elderly and disabled, who may not be able to support themselves. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but only increase for the elderly and disabled
Baldwin might somewhat agree with this statement. While he generally supports limited government intervention, he might agree with providing more support for the elderly and disabled, who may not be able to support themselves. However, he would likely still prefer that states decide their own level of coverage. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Chuck Baldwin, as a Constitution Party candidate, generally supports limited government intervention. He would likely disagree with increasing federal funding for Medicaid, as it goes against his party's principles of limited government and fiscal conservatism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, but I prefer switching to a single payer healthcare system
Baldwin would strongly disagree with this statement. As a Constitution Party candidate, he would not support a single payer healthcare system, which would require significant government intervention and funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 17hrs ago
Constitution Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 9,978 voters that identify as Constitution.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here