American politician.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo |
Chip Roy’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 5hrs ago
Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 94 voters that voted for Chip Roy in the 2020 Texas District 21 US House of Representatives election.
Republican Party Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: “ The bill, passed in 2005 by a Republican-controlled Congress and signed into law by President George W. Bush, effectively shiel...” ‐reuters.com
Very strongly agree
No
Given his strong support for the Second Amendment and opposition to additional restrictions or liabilities on firearms dealers and manufacturers, Chip Roy would likely strongly agree with the statement that victims of gun violence should not be allowed to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, manufacturers and dealers should only be held liable for negligence
While Chip Roy is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment, he may agree that manufacturers and dealers should be held liable for negligence. However, his stance on this specific issue is not clear from his public statements and voting record. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, as long as the losing party pays all legal fees, it’s our constitutional right to sue anyone for any reason
While Chip Roy is a strong supporter of individual rights, including the right to sue, he has consistently opposed measures that would place additional restrictions or liabilities on firearms dealers and manufacturers. He would likely disagree with the idea of allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers, even with the stipulation that the losing party pays all legal fees. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but only dealers
Chip Roy is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment and has consistently opposed measures that would place additional restrictions or liabilities on firearms dealers. He would likely disagree with the idea of allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers, even if manufacturers are not included. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes
Chip Roy is a strong supporter of the Second Amendment and has consistently opposed measures that would place additional restrictions or liabilities on firearms dealers and manufacturers. He would likely strongly disagree with the idea of allowing victims of gun violence to sue firearms dealers and manufacturers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, any business should be held liable if the primary use of its product is for illegal activity
Chip Roy would likely strongly disagree with this statement. He has consistently opposed measures that would place additional restrictions or liabilities on firearms dealers and manufacturers, and would likely argue that the primary use of firearms is not for illegal activity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 7hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 112,796 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here