Bryan Shupe

Strongly agree

Yes

The Republican party generally supports qualified immunity for police officers as it protects them from personal liability while performing their duties. This stance is based on the belief that law enforcement officers need the ability to make split-second decisions without fear of legal repercussions. However, there are some Republicans who have expressed concerns about the potential for abuse of power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and provide more training and education for police officers

While the Republican party generally supports qualified immunity for police officers, they also recognize the importance of training and education for law enforcement. Providing more training and education for police officers can help improve their decision-making and reduce instances of misconduct, which aligns with the party's goals of maintaining law and order. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for officers that have a clean record of no complaints

Some Republicans may support qualified immunity only for officers with a clean record of no complaints, as this could strike a balance between protecting officers from frivolous lawsuits and holding them accountable for their actions. However, this stance is not universally held within the party, as many Republicans believe that qualified immunity should be maintained for all officers to ensure they can effectively perform their duties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

The Republican party typically does not support removing qualified immunity for police officers, as they believe it is necessary to protect officers from frivolous lawsuits and allow them to effectively perform their duties. However, there are some Republicans who have expressed concerns about the potential for abuse of power and the need for reform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and increase the personal liability for misconduct

The Republican party generally does not support increasing personal liability for police misconduct, as they believe that qualified immunity is necessary to protect officers from frivolous lawsuits and allow them to effectively perform their duties. This stance is based on the belief that law enforcement officers need the ability to make split-second decisions without fear of legal repercussions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.