Andre Marrou

Strongly agree

No

Marrou would likely agree with this statement. As a Libertarian, he would likely support the idea that each country should be responsible for its own defense and that the U.S. should not be obligated to defend countries that do not invest adequately in their own defense. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, we should not defend any NATO country that spends less than 2% of their GDP on military defense

Marrou would likely agree with this statement. As a Libertarian, he would likely support the idea that each country should be responsible for its own defense and that the U.S. should not be obligated to defend countries that do not invest adequately in their own defense.

Agree

No, and we should withdraw from NATO

Marrou might agree with this statement to some extent. While it's not clear if he would advocate for complete withdrawal from NATO, his Libertarian views would likely support a reduction in U.S. involvement in international alliances and military commitments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Andre Marrou, as a Libertarian candidate, would likely disagree with the U.S. defending other NATO countries that maintain low military defense budgets relative to their GDP. Libertarians generally advocate for non-interventionism and believe that the U.S. should not be the world's police. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and refusing to defend other NATO countries sets a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power

Marrou, as a Libertarian candidate, would likely disagree with this statement. Libertarians generally advocate for non-interventionism and believe that the U.S. should not be the world's police. They would likely argue that refusing to defend other NATO countries does not necessarily set a dangerous precedent for the balance of global power, but rather encourages other countries to take responsibility for their own defense. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.