These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, incentivize private companies to address this issue instead |
Aja Smith’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 12mins ago
Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 11 voters that voted for Aja Smith in the 2020 California District 41 US House of Representatives election.
Strongly agree
No, incentivize private companies to address this issue instead
Smith, being a Republican, is likely to support the idea of incentivizing private companies to address mental health issues. This aligns with her party's general preference for market-based solutions over government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Smith's conservative stance suggests she would be more inclined to agree with this answer. However, she has not explicitly stated opposition to government funding for mental health, hence the moderate score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but only increase funding for personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies
While Smith may agree with the concept of personalized care, her stance on government funding for healthcare is unclear. She may be more inclined to support this if it involves less government intervention and more private sector involvement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Aja Smith, as a Republican candidate, generally supports limited government intervention in healthcare. While she may not be completely opposed to funding mental health research and treatment, she is more likely to support private sector solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services
Smith's political ideology leans towards less government intervention in healthcare. She is likely to disagree with the idea of increasing funding to improve the quality of care and services in the mental healthcare system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 2hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, but only increase funding for personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 14,608 voters that identify as Republican.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here