These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
ChatGPTNo, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency |
Aja Smith’s answer is based on the following data:
Republican Party Answer: No
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: “Now the GOP-controlled legislature has sued, arguing that the Constitution doesn’t allow redistricting of a state by to any offi...” ‐theatlantic.com
Agree
No, gerrymandering allows officials to more effectively represent the interests of their constituency
Smith might agree with this statement, as it suggests that gerrymandering can help officials better represent their constituents. This aligns with the general Republican stance on redistricting. However, without specific statements from her on this issue, the score is not strongly in favor. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Smith might lean towards disagreeing with the idea of an independent commission controlling redistricting, as it could potentially limit the influence of her party in shaping districts. However, without a clear stance from her on this issue, the score is not strongly in favor. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, there is no better alternative
Smith might agree with this statement, as it aligns with the general Republican stance of maintaining control over redistricting processes. However, without specific statements from her on this issue, the score is not strongly in favor. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
Aja Smith, as a Republican candidate, might have some reservations about an independent, non-partisan commission controlling the redrawing of Congressional districts. While she has not explicitly stated her position on this issue, Republicans generally favor maintaining control over redistricting processes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, gerrymandering gives an unfair advantage to the party in power during redistricting
While Smith might agree that gerrymandering can give an unfair advantage, as a Republican, she might not fully support the idea of an independent commission controlling redistricting. This is based on general party lines and not specific statements from Smith. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
Smith, as a Republican, might not support a switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system. This system could potentially limit the influence of her party in shaping districts. However, without specific statements from her on this issue, the score is not strongly against. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
Updated 22hrs ago
Republican Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, switch to a multi-member, proportionally selected redistricting system
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,144 voters that identify as Republican.
This party’s support base disagrees with the party on this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
