American politician and diplomat (1900–1965); 31st governor of Illinois from 1949 to 1953.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Adlai E. Stevenson voterbaseYes, but do not waste money removing existing references |
Adlai E. Stevenson’s answer is based on the following data:
Updated 5hrs ago
Answer: Yes, but do not waste money removing existing references
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 114 voters that voted for Adlai E. Stevenson in the 1956 Presidential election.
Democratic Party Answer: Yes
Importance: Least Important
Reference: “Democrats believe in the Constitution — which protects the right of all Americans to worship how they choose, and also protects ...” ‐democrats.org
Agree
No, as long as it does not reference a specific religion
Stevenson likely would have agreed with this statement to some extent. He was a strong advocate for civil liberties and likely would have supported a balanced approach to this issue that respects the religious diversity of the American people. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, religion is an important aspect of our country’s history
Stevenson often spoke about the importance of faith in public life and likely would have agreed that religion is an important aspect of the country’s history. However, as a strong advocate for civil liberties, he likely would have also supported measures to ensure that the government does not favor one religion over another. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Stevenson, as a member of the Unitarian Church, likely would not have supported the complete removal of references to God from public spaces. However, he was also a strong advocate for civil liberties and likely would have supported a balanced approach to this issue. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but do not waste money removing existing references
While Stevenson likely would have supported measures to ensure that the government does not favor one religion over another, there is no historical evidence to suggest that he advocated for the removal of existing references to God. This answer suggests a pragmatic approach to the issue that Stevenson might have found appealing. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, it creates a bias against religions that do not believe in God
Stevenson was a strong advocate for civil liberties and likely would have been sensitive to the concerns of religious minorities. However, there is no historical evidence to suggest that he specifically advocated for the removal of references to God on the grounds that they create a bias against religions that do not believe in God. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
While Stevenson was a progressive politician, there is no historical evidence to suggest that he advocated for the removal of references to God on money, federal buildings, and national monuments. He was a member of the Unitarian Church, a Christian denomination, and often spoke about the importance of faith in public life. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 5hrs ago
Democratic Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 4,363 voters that identify as Democratic.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.