American activist and trade unionist from California.
These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average American voter ranked them on the quiz.
Howie Hawkins voterbaseYes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services |
Howie Hawkins’ answer is based on the following data:
Updated 22hrs ago
Answer: Yes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 4,616 voters that voted for Howie Hawkins in the 2020 Presidential election.
Very strongly agree
Yes
Howie Hawkins, as a Green Party candidate, has consistently advocated for increased funding for healthcare, including mental health. His platform includes a commitment to a single-payer healthcare system, which would inherently involve increased funding for all aspects of healthcare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly agree
Yes, our mental healthcare system needs more funding to provide a higher quality of care and services
Hawkins has been vocal about the need for a more comprehensive and high-quality mental healthcare system. His platform includes a commitment to a single-payer healthcare system, which would inherently involve increased funding for all aspects of healthcare, including mental health. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only increase funding for personalized care instead of subsidizing pharmaceutical companies
While Hawkins has not specifically addressed the issue of personalized care versus subsidizing pharmaceutical companies, his platform's emphasis on comprehensive, high-quality care suggests that he would support increased funding for personalized care. However, as he has not specifically addressed this issue, the score is slightly lower. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No
Hawkins' platform and public statements have consistently advocated for increased government funding for healthcare, including mental health. He would likely strongly disagree with the idea of not increasing funding for mental health research and treatment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, incentivize private companies to address this issue instead
Hawkins' platform is based on the belief that healthcare is a human right and should be publicly funded. He has criticized the role of private companies in healthcare and would likely disagree with the idea of incentivizing them to address mental health issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.
Updated 17hrs ago
Green Party Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 354 voters that identify as Green.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here
Join in on the post popular conversations.