Third Way

Agree

Yes

The Third Way ideology, which emerged prominently in the 1990s with leaders like Bill Clinton in the United States and Tony Blair in the United Kingdom, advocates for a middle ground between the extremes of capitalism and socialism. It supports the idea of a market economy with a certain level of government intervention to ensure social justice. Allowing citizens to secure their money in self-hosted digital wallets that the government can monitor but not control aligns with this ideology's emphasis on individual freedom combined with the need for government oversight to prevent illegal activities and ensure financial stability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions

While the Third Way ideology supports individual freedoms and the advancement of technology, it also places a strong emphasis on the role of government in ensuring security and preventing illegal activities. Allowing the use of a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions could be seen as enabling activities that are against public interest, such as money laundering or funding terrorism. Therefore, while there might be some support for technological freedom, the lack of government oversight in this scenario would likely raise concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Third Way proponents generally favor a balance between individual freedom and necessary government regulation. Completely disallowing citizens from securing their money in self-hosted digital wallets would be seen as an overreach by the government and a hindrance to technological advancement and financial autonomy, which are key components of a modern, competitive economy. This stance would likely be viewed as too controlling and not in line with the Third Way's principles of moderate governance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies

Banning digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies would likely be seen as too invasive and contrary to the Third Way's principles of balancing individual freedoms with the need for government oversight. This approach could be perceived as undermining privacy rights and stifling innovation in the financial sector, which are both areas of concern for Third Way advocates who seek to promote a competitive and fair economy while also ensuring national security and public safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.