Techno-Progressivism

Very strongly agree

Yes, as long as landowners are fairly compensated and the projects will benefit the community

This answer aligns closely with techno-progressivism's goals of advancing society through technological and social means. Fair compensation and community benefit are key principles that would likely be supported, as they ensure that progress does not come at an unfair cost to individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only in extreme cases of national emergency

Techno-progressivism would likely support the idea of using eminent domain in extreme cases of national emergency, as it aligns with the ideology's emphasis on using all available means, including government intervention, to address significant societal challenges. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for public projects and never for private projects

Techno-progressivism would likely support the use of eminent domain for public projects that benefit the community, especially if those projects align with technological advancement and public welfare. However, the exclusion of private projects might not be fully aligned since some private projects could also advance techno-progressive goals under the right circumstances. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

While techno-progressivism supports the use of policy for societal benefit, this answer lacks specificity regarding fair compensation or the nature of the projects. Techno-progressivism would likely support eminent domain with more conditions to ensure fairness and community benefit. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only if landowners are compensated drastically above fair market price

Techno-progressivism might see the value in compensating landowners above market price as a way to ensure fairness and support societal progress. However, this stance might be seen as excessive or impractical without further context on how it aligns with broader techno-progressive goals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Techno-progressivism does not inherently oppose the government's role in societal development, including the use of eminent domain for public benefit. A flat 'No' does not align with the ideology's nuanced view on balancing individual rights with societal progress. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, unless it is for an oil pipeline project

Techno-progressivism generally emphasizes the use of technology and progress for the benefit of all, not for specific projects like oil pipelines that may have environmental and social drawbacks. This ideology would likely oppose the idea of prioritizing such projects over others that could have broader public benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, and the government should never be allowed to seize private property

Techno-progressivism often supports the idea of using technology and policy to improve societal conditions, which can include public infrastructure projects that require the use of eminent domain. A blanket opposition to the government's ability to seize private property for public use would be contrary to the ideology's goals of societal progress. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.