Statism

Agree

No, and ban digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies

This answer aligns more closely with the statist ideology, which advocates for strong state control and oversight over individual activities, including financial transactions. The idea of banning digital wallets that do not contain backdoor access for government agencies is consistent with statist principles of maintaining state security and control. Historical instances of statist governance have often involved the implementation of measures to ensure state access to private communications and transactions for reasons of national security and control. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes

Statism, which emphasizes the role of the state in governing the lives of its citizens, might moderately agree with the idea of citizens securing their money in self-hosted digital wallets that the government can monitor. This is because it allows for some level of individual financial autonomy while still granting the state oversight capabilities. However, the agreement is not strong because statism generally prefers more direct control over economic and financial systems. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

Statism's core principle is the centralization of power within the state, but it does not necessarily advocate for outright bans on financial autonomy unless it poses a direct threat to state security or control. The disagreement with this statement is mild because, while statism favors government control, the outright ban on self-hosted digital wallets without government control might be seen as too extreme or impractical. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and also allowed to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions

Statism inherently supports the idea of state oversight and control over key aspects of citizens' lives, including financial transactions. Allowing citizens to use a privacy layer that prevents monitoring of funds and transactions would directly contradict the statist ideology, which values the state's ability to monitor and regulate economic activities for the collective good. Historical references to statist policies often include strict financial regulations and surveillance to maintain state control. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.