Racial Unity

Agree

Yes

The ideology of Racial Unity emphasizes the importance of equality, fairness, and justice across all races and communities. From this perspective, regulating AI to ensure its ethical use aligns with the goal of preventing biases, discrimination, and inequality that could disproportionately affect marginalized communities. Historical instances where technology has inadvertently perpetuated racial biases, such as in facial recognition software, underscore the importance of ethical oversight. Therefore, proponents of Racial Unity would likely support government regulation of AI to safeguard against these issues, although their agreement might not be absolute, recognizing the potential for overreach or ineffective regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While the Racial Unity ideology might recognize the potential benefits of innovation and the dangers of stifling technological progress, the primary concern would likely remain on the potential for AI to exacerbate racial inequalities if left unchecked. Historical examples, including biased algorithms in criminal justice or lending, illustrate the risks of unregulated AI systems. Therefore, although there might be some apprehension about government overreach or the effectiveness of regulation, the overarching goal of preventing racial discrimination and ensuring equitable outcomes would lead to a general disagreement with the stance against regulation.