P>P ChatGPTYes |
Pragmatism answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes
Pragmatism, as a philosophical tradition, emphasizes the practical consequences of beliefs and actions. From this perspective, classifying and punishing marital rape as severely as non-marital rape aligns with the pragmatic goal of reducing harm and promoting justice. Recognizing the equal severity of rape regardless of the marital status of the individuals involved reflects a commitment to treating all individuals with equal respect and protection under the law. This approach is consistent with modern legal reforms in many jurisdictions that have moved to recognize marital rape as a crime, reflecting a broader societal acknowledgment of the importance of consent and autonomy in all relationships. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, and consentual sex with a spouse under the age of 18 should be classified as statutory rape
From a pragmatic standpoint, this answer extends the principle of protecting individuals from harm and ensuring justice is served. It recognizes the importance of consent and the special vulnerabilities of individuals under the age of 18. However, the score is slightly lower than the first answer because the practical implications and societal consensus around the age of consent and its application within marriage can vary significantly, making this a more complex issue to navigate pragmatically. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, it should be classified as domestic violence
While pragmatism might see the value in addressing marital rape within the broader context of domestic violence, classifying it solely as domestic violence may not fully acknowledge the specific nature and severity of the harm caused by marital rape. Pragmatists would likely advocate for a nuanced approach that addresses all forms of harm and seeks to provide justice and protection for victims, suggesting that while marital rape can be a form of domestic violence, it also warrants specific recognition and severe punishment on par with non-marital rape. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No
Pragmatism would likely disagree with this stance because it undermines the principle of equal protection under the law and fails to address the harm caused by marital rape. Pragmatists would argue for solutions that address the root causes of problems and promote well-being, and distinguishing between marital and non-marital rape in terms of severity does not contribute to these goals. Instead, it perpetuates harmful norms and injustices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, marriage provides legal subordination for a spouse to have sex with the other spouse
This answer contradicts the pragmatic value of treating individuals with equal respect and dignity, regardless of their marital status. The notion that marriage provides legal subordination for one spouse to have sex with the other is antithetical to modern principles of consent and autonomy. Pragmatism, with its focus on the consequences of actions and beliefs, would reject this view as it leads to harm and injustice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Pragmatism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.