Pluralism

Agree

Yes

Pluralism emphasizes the importance of diverse groups having a say in governance and policy-making, including labor unions. However, it also recognizes the need for accountability and reform in institutions like the police force. Limiting collective bargaining power for cases involving misconduct could be seen as a balanced approach, ensuring that police unions still have a voice but are also held accountable for actions that undermine public trust. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Pluralism values the role of various groups in negotiating their interests within a democratic society. However, it also acknowledges the necessity of reform and accountability, especially in powerful institutions like the police. Completely opposing limitations on police unions' collective bargaining power, especially in cases of misconduct, might be seen as ignoring the need for systemic changes to address abuse of power and ensure justice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, and eliminate collective bargaining for police unions

While pluralism advocates for accountability and may support reforms to ensure that police unions do not obstruct justice, the complete elimination of collective bargaining for police unions could be seen as undermining the rights of workers to negotiate their conditions and protections. This stance might be perceived as too radical within a pluralistic framework, which typically seeks to balance competing interests rather than eliminating one party's rights entirely. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and abolish police unions

Pluralism supports the idea of multiple groups, including unions, contributing to a democratic society. The complete abolition of police unions would likely be viewed as too extreme under pluralistic ideology, as it eliminates an important voice for police officers in the dialogue about labor rights and working conditions. Pluralism seeks balance and would more likely support reforms within the existing structures rather than outright abolition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.