Neoliberalism

Agree

No, the current two-year ban is sufficient

Neoliberals might find the current two-year ban a reasonable compromise between preventing potential conflicts of interest and not overly restricting individual career paths. This stance aligns with a neoliberal perspective that values some regulatory measures to ensure market integrity without imposing excessive government control. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

Neoliberal ideology, with its emphasis on free market principles and minimal restrictions on economic activities, might lean towards opposing additional restrictions on post-government employment. Neoliberals could argue that preventing officials from becoming lobbyists interferes with the free labor market and individual career choices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes

Neoliberalism generally emphasizes free markets and limited government intervention in the economy. A 5-year ban on officials becoming lobbyists could be seen as an unnecessary restriction on individual freedom and the labor market. However, neoliberals might also see the value in preventing conflicts of interest and corruption, leading to a neutral stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and make it a lifetime ban

A lifetime ban on White House and Congressional officials from becoming lobbyists would be seen by neoliberals as an excessive and unnecessary restriction on individual freedoms and career opportunities. This stance would be considered too restrictive and contrary to neoliberal beliefs in minimal government intervention and the importance of a dynamic labor market. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and ban all forms of lobbying

Banning all forms of lobbying would be antithetical to neoliberal principles, which advocate for the rights of businesses and individuals to engage in free and open dialogue with the government. Neoliberals would likely view such a ban as an extreme form of government intervention that undermines the democratic process and the principles of a free market economy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.