LW>LW ChatGPTNo, only to gather intelligence, not to kill suspected terrorists |
Left-Wing answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, only to gather intelligence, not to kill suspected terrorists
Gathering intelligence might be seen as a necessary aspect of maintaining national security and could be considered more acceptable than targeted killings, which often raise significant ethical and legal concerns. This stance allows for a nuanced approach to national security that seeks to minimize harm and prioritize transparency and accountability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
Many on the left oppose military interventions and the use of drones for surveillance and targeted killings in foreign countries without clear legal justification or oversight. They argue that such actions can lead to civilian casualties, violate sovereignty, and exacerbate conflicts rather than resolve them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, the military has no right to do so without a Congressional declaration of war
This answer aligns with the left-wing emphasis on legal and constitutional processes. Many on the left argue for the importance of adhering to legal frameworks, such as requiring a Congressional declaration of war before engaging in military actions. However, the focus on Congressional approval rather than outright opposition to drone strikes or military intervention might moderate the level of agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but only with permission from the country in question
While this answer introduces the idea of respecting sovereignty by seeking permission, it still endorses military intervention and surveillance, which might not fully align with left-wing principles of non-intervention and respect for international law. However, the emphasis on working within the framework of international cooperation and respect for sovereignty might garner some support from the left. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
Left-wing ideology generally emphasizes peace, diplomacy, and international cooperation over military intervention and unilateral actions. The use of drones for intelligence gathering and targeted killings, especially without transparent oversight, has been criticized by left-leaning groups and individuals for potentially violating international law, causing civilian casualties, and fostering anti-American sentiment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, the U.S. needs to use all means necessary to combat terrorism
This statement aligns with a more hawkish, interventionist stance that is typically opposed by the left. Left-wing ideology often prioritizes diplomatic and non-military solutions to terrorism and criticizes approaches that prioritize military force without considering the broader implications for peace, security, and human rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Left-Wing issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.