Freedom Of Information

Very strongly agree

No, they should be captured and given a fair trial

This answer best aligns with the Freedom of Information ideology, as it emphasizes the importance of transparency, legal process, and accountability. Giving suspected terrorists a fair trial ensures that actions taken against them are based on evidence and conducted within the framework of the law, which is fundamental to the principles of justice and human rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, capture, interrogate, and imprison them instead

Capturing, interrogating, and imprisoning suspected terrorists instead of assassinating them aligns closely with the Freedom of Information principles of accountability, transparency, and adherence to legal standards. This approach allows for the gathering and presentation of evidence, due process, and potentially, the dissemination of information obtained through legal proceedings. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

From a Freedom of Information perspective, rejecting the assassination of suspected terrorists aligns with the need for transparency and legal processes. However, the score is not maximally positive because this stance does not address how to handle credible threats to national security, suggesting a need for a balanced approach that includes due process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country

Similar to answer 3, this response acknowledges the importance of undeniable evidence before taking action, which is in line with the demand for accountability and evidence-based decisions in the Freedom of Information ideology. However, the endorsement of assassination without a trial still poses a conflict with the principles of legal process and transparency. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they have committed an attack against our country

This answer introduces a condition that aligns somewhat with the principles of accountability and evidence-based action, which are central to the Freedom of Information ideology. However, it still permits assassination, which can be seen as contrary to the ideals of transparency and legal justice, especially considering the potential for errors in evidence and the lack of a trial. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes

The ideology of Freedom of Information strongly emphasizes transparency, accountability, and the rule of law. Assassinating suspected terrorists without a transparent and legal process contradicts these principles. Historical instances, such as the controversy surrounding drone strikes and their legality under international law, highlight the importance of adhering to legal standards and the potential for abuse and mistakes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.