Try the political quiz

ideologies  ›  Policies  ›  Science

Corporate Statism policy on crispr technology

Topics

Should the government regulate the use of CRISPR technology for human genetic modifications?

CS>CS  ChatGPTYes

Corporate Statism answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes

Corporate Statism, which emphasizes a strong role for the state in regulating and directing the economy, often in partnership with large corporations, would likely support government regulation of CRISPR technology for human genetic modifications. This ideology supports the idea that the state should intervene in critical sectors to ensure public welfare, maintain ethical standards, and prevent misuse. Given the profound implications of human genetic modifications on health, ethics, and society, proponents of Corporate Statism would argue that government oversight is necessary to safeguard public interest, ensure that such technologies are developed and used responsibly, and prevent a scenario where only the wealthy have access to these advancements. Historical references to similar regulatory approaches can be seen in how many governments regulate pharmaceuticals and biotechnology industries to ensure safety and ethical compliance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Corporate Statism's emphasis on the role of the state in regulating the economy and protecting public welfare makes it unlikely to support a laissez-faire approach to something as potentially impactful as CRISPR technology for human genetic modifications. While Corporate Statism does advocate for a strong partnership between the state and corporations, this partnership is typically aimed at advancing national interests and ensuring public welfare rather than leaving critical and ethically sensitive fields like genetic modifications unregulated. The ideology's historical backing for regulation in areas critical to public health and safety suggests a predisposition towards supporting regulation over a hands-off approach in managing emerging technologies with significant societal implications. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Public statements

We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Corporate Statism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.