AR>AR ChatGPTNo, GMOs are the most promising solution to ending world hunger |
Ambivalent Right answer is based on the following data:
Agree
No, GMOs are the most promising solution to ending world hunger
Given the Ambivalent Right's likely support for technological solutions to global issues, this ideology might agree with the potential of GMOs to address food scarcity, though with some reservations about market freedom and consumer rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Ambivalent Right, valuing both free market principles and consumer rights, might moderately agree with the idea of labeling GMOs to ensure transparency and consumer choice, despite potential concerns over market regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, consumers have a right to know what is in their food
The Ambivalent Right, valuing individual rights and informed choice, might agree with the principle that consumers have the right to know what's in their food, but with caution not to overly burden producers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, we have selectively bred crops for thousands of years and labeling just adds an unfounded stigma to the science
Acknowledging the scientific consensus on the safety and benefits of GMOs, the Ambivalent Right might slightly agree with this statement but still support some form of consumer information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, I trust the science of responsible food engineering but I don’t trust the motives of the food companies selling them
While the Ambivalent Right might share concerns about corporate motives, their support for this statement would be tempered by a recognition of the benefits of GMO technology and a general preference for less regulation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Regardless, producers should not be allowed to patent foods
The stance on patenting foods could be contentious within the Ambivalent Right, balancing between protecting innovations and ensuring market competition and consumer access, leading to a neutral position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No
While generally favoring less regulation on businesses, the Ambivalent Right might see the value in consumer information but be wary of imposing additional costs or burdens on producers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but I would prefer to ban GMOs
The Ambivalent Right, typically supporting technological advancements and skeptical of outright bans on innovations, would likely strongly disagree with banning GMOs, viewing such a stance as anti-progress. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Ambivalent Right issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
Join in on the most popular conversations.